Comments on: 06-06-06, June 6th, 2006 = 666

By: Tim 49

Tim 49 — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 03:39:54 +0000

6/6/03 is the date of my cancer dx.God willin’, I will be seeing 3 yrs. of survivorship on that day.Today, I am
GRATEFUL!!!!!The date is just a MAN-MADE time marker–whose calendar?/what religion?/how do I feel and operate today as one of God’s children.I am REASONABLY happy and peaceful and TRY and follow the Golden Rule every day.No
fanaticism,no religious theatrics,no seclusion or avoidance or loneliness I am part of hte human race and pray —every day—to help keep SANITY in OUR lives by
PRACTICING it!!! “It is in giving that we receive….”

peace/namaste/carry on
Love,Tim

By: Tim McHyde

Tim McHyde — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 21:57:15 +0000

Sure, scary things are predicted for our future in the Bible, but none of them are this year. Perhaps the Middle East war prophesied in Psalm 83 will come due to Iran’s nuclear aspirations in the next few years, but that’s not even among the scary prophecies found in the Book of Revelation.

By: Joselyn

Joselyn — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 21:51:55 +0000

nice article i feel so much better i have been thinking what will happen that day. but is there anything in that bible thats says that there IS something happening because to tell you the truth am really scared.

By: Marlon Bayas

Marlon Bayas — Thu, 25 May 2006 19:17:05 +0000

this web site might help you with this theory and why the deivls number is 666 http://ask.yahoo.com/ask/20020529.html

By: Daryl Breese

Daryl Breese — Sun, 14 May 2006 06:03:54 +0000

Tim is correct. God scripture is best read whole, no codes, gematria, or hidden meanings. However, do not be mislead by John’s 666 or 616 in Revelation. He was not hiding anything in code, Ancient Hebrew was the only language he knew that recognized the meaning of multiple w’s, they could be 6, 16, 66, 616, or 666. Of course he then wrote it, or his students wrote the eight longhand copies for the seven churches of asia. After all he was eighty or so. That would account for the 616 and 666 showing up. Both could be translated from www. John pronounced his knowledge of Hebrew by putting two Hebrew words in Revelation, Armaged’don and Ab’bodon………simple really.

By: Melanie

Melanie — Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:06:59 +0000

Hey,

My birthday is on the 06.06.06 which highly frightens me.

That is all.

By: Daryl Breese

Daryl Breese — Sun, 26 Mar 2006 21:42:36 +0000

www in ancient hebrew is 666 or 616 in translation. Read “Revelation www is 666″ the page is copied from a concordance.

By: Tim McHyde

Tim McHyde — Sat, 25 Mar 2006 15:37:44 +0000

Michael,

It may be that 06/06/06 has occultic signficance to the NWO as you say. However, is this enough to expect “something big” to happen that day? Is that information predictively useful?

I have watched many dates over the years predicted for these same “occultic significance” reasons and they have all failed. I suspect there are two reasons for this. 1) These occultic significances are highly subjective and prone to error of interpretation as to whether it’s a day meriting a disaster or what kind and where and 2) even it is accurately established as the NWO’s will it still does not mean that it is God’s will who is in control and will stop it if not.

So, it’s better to go directly to God’s word which reveals His will of what He wants to happen and which we are told to use predictively (Rev 1:1). Then we can count on it happening and at the same time develop a richer understanding of God’s entire Word at the same time (rather than occult words).

By: Tim McHyde

Tim McHyde — Sat, 25 Mar 2006 15:24:55 +0000

PD Graves,

The very Historicist site you linked says historicists believe the papacy is the Antichrist. Also see here for a good summary of their beliefs http://www.historicism.net/ .

For the record, I’m not Historicist, Futurist, or Preterist, as if those are the only choices. I am “alternative” and reject all popular schools as fundamentally flawed because they were formulated before the prophecies were unsealed, in other words, they were based on misinterpretations.

As far as Historicists supporting their position with facts and not speculation, well so do I. They just interpret the text symbolically to fit their facts and I read the text plainly usually literally and find the facts that fit it.

Charles name calculates to 666 to fulfill the plain face value meaning of the text. He has a heraldic achievement which also literally depcits what the plain face value meaning of the Beast from the Sea describes.

I think the interpretation that explains the Bible without saying “it doesnt mean what it plainly says” as Historicism does, is always the right one when given a choice between that and a symbolic interpretation. Unfortunately, it has become acceptable to interpret Bible prophecy differently than the rest of the Bible and not realize it’s breaking Scripture to do it that way.

By: PD GRAVES

PD GRAVES — Wed, 22 Mar 2006 00:42:55 +0000

Too long to complete here. Go to: http://www.historicist.com/articles/historicism.htm Then go to:
http://www.biblelight.net/666.htm

Historicism, Futurism, Preterism
Lawrence R. Kellie

This page will examine the history and meaning of the three principal methods of Biblical, more specifically prophetic, interpretation–Historicism, Futurism, and Preterism.

Historicism
The Historicist school of prophetic interpretation results in a progressive and continuous fulfillment of prophecy. This continuous fulfillment starts in Daniel’s time (circa 600 BC), continues through John the Revelator’s time (circa 100 A.D.), on to the Second Coming of Jesus. (Froom, v1, p23)

This school of prophetic interpretation is not novel or new. Biblical scholars throughout the centuries, actually from 2 BC to the present, have ascribed to it. Daniel, John the Revelator, Hippolytus, Joachim, Wyclif, Luther, Knox, Newton, and Wesley (Froom, v1., p2) are examples of the prominent people who believed in and used historicist method of prophetic interpretation.

Futurism
Futurism, developed by Francisco Riberia (1537-1591), owes its existence to the Counter Reformation. During the Protestant Reformation, the reformers, using Historicism, concluded that the system, as best represented by the Pope, of the Roman Catholic Church was the Beast of Revelation 13. Shea states:

Synopsis of Futurism
Since the Antichrist is in the future, it could not be the Papacy.

Summary of the Fallacies of Futurism
* Futurism is designed to relieve pressure on Rome.
* Futurism violates the principle of consistent prophetic symbolism.
* Futurism makes prophetic time meaningless.
* Futurism removes application from historical verification.
* Futurism creates an arbitrary gap which is an unjustifiable device.
* Futurism ignores the view of the early church.
* Futurism cannot be correct if Preterism is correct. (Froom2:803-805.)

Too long to complete here. Go to: http://www.historicist.com/articles/historicism.htm Then go to:
http://www.biblelight.net/666.htm

I’m not saying they have all the answers, but I believe they should weigh in when you look at the meaning of 666.