Richard Spendiff wrote:
The main point I was making is that logically the beast cannot be mystery Babylon because then she would burn herself. Now, to be fair, if you make such whopping mistakes as this no one is going to take you seriously.
Two Mystery Babylons
I guess you overlooked that there must be two mystery babylons that fall as Revelation 18 says â€œbabylon has fallen, FALLENâ€ (and God does not stutter but instead most prophecies are dual). Jeremiah 50-51 calls the first one to be destroyed â€œdaughter babylonâ€ and the â€œmother babylonâ€ will remain afterwards and be â€œsore confoundedâ€ at seeing this happen to her daughter. America came out of Britain which Daniel 7â€™s eagleâ€™s wings coming out of the lion also represents respectively. The plucking of wings is the destruction of daughter babylon America who rides the greater beast (holds it back from rising which America as policeman of the world has done for two world wars now, but will fail at World War III). The Lion in Daniel 7 then rises up, as Britain will also head up the NWO Beast government (which is where Prince Charles the leading Antichrist candidate of course is heir to the throne).
This explains why the Beast ruling the entire world is destroyed at Jesus coming in Revelation 19 but many other prophecies also say that Babylon falls at Jesus coming, or the Day of the Lord (Isaiah 13), and yet Babylon is also said to fall before the Mark of the global Beast is rolled out as Revelation 14 plainly says in the three angels messages. This first Babylon is America defeated by Russia and her allies, the second is the NWO under England, the lion, defeated by the glorified Messiah.
Donâ€™t feel bad at making this mistake, I donâ€™t take you any less seriously because this is easy to miss given the dual prophecy element. But I will confess that your put down of my position as a â€œwhopping mistakeâ€ when we’re discussing a subject where there is little agreement does make you sound out of touch, and harder for me to take seriously. I see the same tone here as well, is this Richard Spendiff by any chance you?